Saturday, February 4, 2017

WHAT IS REALITY WHAT IS MAN

DO NOT DEPEND ON THE UNREAL
 
Man's error is to depend on unreal objects.  "I cannot live without these things that arise and later perish" it is his main error. He (Self) being visibly and veritably a part of Paramatma (God) is real and unchanging (without any modification).   All the things that are in this world are unreal and changing.    
 
"Nasato Vidhyate Bhaavo,  Naabhaavo Vidhyate satah |"  (Gita 2/16)
 
"The unreal has no existence, and the real never ceases to be"   (Gita 2/16)


In Life -  the body, its abilities, it's companions, time, places, circumstances etc, are unreal but I (Self) is the same That which changes is "unreal" while the unchanging 'Self' that remains the same is "real". The Self, though being "real" (imperishable, eternal), believes itself to be dependent on the "unreal" (perishable).  The 'Self' thinks it cannot manage without the 'unreal' (the body, mind, family, friends, money, possessions etc). a mistake. 


The "Self"  thinks that without the body, Without money without a family without a house, without clothes without food-water I cannot survive -  all these are UNREAL dependencies the perishable, the transient.  has no independent existence.   that which does not have an independent existence.  That which depends on something;  constantly moves towards destruction;  that which is perishing all the time; that which is constantly moving towards non-existence.  Though the Self being real, it takes the support of the unreal, and it becomes dependent on the unreal, and even in that dependent state, it thinks that it is independence - this is the main flaw.  


This is a great misfortune that you regard your dependence as independence.  There is no greater ERROR than this assumption.   All such as, injustice, lying, cheating, and also hell etc.,  are the result of this dependence.  Now think! Is money "Self" (Swayam)  or is it "foreign" (par, not part of Self)?  Is there independence when there is dependence on money? It is a great misfortune that though being dependent, you feel you are independent.  You assume that if you had money then you would immediately take the train, fly oversees, buy so and so things. This is dependence on money.   It is clearly evident, that without money you cannot get things, then when will you become independent?  You will become independent, when you will have no need for anything at all; when you do not need food-water, nor clothes.  When will this happen?  It will happen, when you feel you are separate from the body.       
       from "Kalyaankari Pravachan"  in Hindi by Swami Ramsukhdasji.

Thursday, February 2, 2017

Persians the first victims of Islamic Terror

The Iranians, or Persians were one of the first peoples to come under the Islamic boot. Around 636AD, Mohammed’s 2nd successor, Caliph Umar, dealt the Persian Sassanid Empire a humiliating defeat at the Battle of Qasadiyyah on the banks of the Euphrates River. In the aftermath of the battle he sent the following letter to Shah Yazdgird III, Emperor of Persia:
“I do not foresee a good future for you and your nation save your acceptance of my terms and your submission to me. There was a time when your country ruled half the world, but now see how your sun has set. On all fronts your armies have been defeated and your nation is condemned to extinction. I point out to you the path whereby you might escape this fate. Namely, that you begin worshipping the one god, the unique deity, the only god who created all that is. I bring you his message. Order your nation to cease the false worship of fire and to join us, that they may join the truth.Worship Allah the creator of the world. Worship Allah and accept Islam as the path of salvation. End now your polytheistic ways and become Muslims that you may accept Allah-u-Akbar as your savior. This is the only way of securing your own survival and the peace of your Persians. You will do this if you know what is good for you and for your Persians. Submission is your only option. Allah u Akbar.” (Caliph Umar)
Yazdgird’s response is one of the most eloquent rebuttals of Islamic aggression in all of history. Keep in mind this was almost 1400 years ago, the 7th century AD. Islam was a brand new upstart, but thousands of years of Persian civilization and 300 years of the Sassanid empire were about to be crushed by it’s zealous warriors.
“In the name of Ahuramazda, the Creator of Life and Wisdom. In your letter you summon us Persians to your god whom you call “Allah-u-Akbar”; and because of your barbarity and ignorance, without knowing who we are and Whom we worship, you demand that we seek out your god and become worshipers of “Allah-u-Akbar”. How strange that you occupy the seat of the Arab Caliph but are as ignorant as any desert roaming Arab! You admonish me to become monotheistic in faith. Ignorant man, for thousands of years we Persians have, in this land of culture and art, been monotheistic and five times a day have we offered prayers to God’s Throne of Oneness. While we laid the foundations of philanthropy and righteousness and kindness in this world and held high the ensign of “Good Thoughts, Good Words and Good Deeds”, you and your ancestors were desert wanderers who ate snakes and lizards and buried your innocent daughters alive. You Arabs who have no regard for God’s creatures, who mercilessly put people to the sword, who mistreat your women, who attack caravans and are highway robbers, who commit murder, who kidnap women and spouses; how dare you presume to teach us, who are above these evils, to worship God? You tell me to cease the worship of fire and to worship God instead! To us Persians the light of Fire is reminiscent of the Light of God. The radiance and the sun-like warmth of fire exuberates our hearts, and the pleasant warmth of it brings our hearts and spirits closer together, that we may be philanthropic, kind and considerate, that gentleness and forgiveness may become our way of life, and that thereby the Light of God may keep shining in our hearts. Our God is the Great Ahuramazda. Strange is this that you too have now decided to give Him a name, and you call Him by the name of “Allah-u-Akbar”. But we are nothing like you. We, in the name of Ahuramazda, practice compassion and love and goodness and righteousness and forgiveness, and care for the dispossessed and the unfortunate; But you, in the name of your “Allah-u-Akbar” commit murder, create misery and subject others to suffering! Tell me truly who is to blame for your misdeeds? Your god who orders genocide, plunder and destruction, or you who do these things in his name? Or both? You, who have spent all your days in brutality and barbarity, have now come out of your desolate deserts resolved to teach, by the blade and by conquest, the worship of God to a people who have for thousands of years been civilized and have relied on culture and knowledge and art as mighty edifices. What have you, in the name of your “Allah-u-Akbar”, taught these armies of Islam besides destruction and pillage and murder that you now presume to summon others to your god? Today, my people’s fortunes have changed. Their armies, who were subjects of Ahuramazada, have now been defeated by the Arab armies of “Allah-u-Akbar”. And they are being forced, at the point of the sword, to convert to the god by the name of “Allah-u-Akbar”. And are forced to offer him prayers five times a day but now in Arabic; since apparently your “Allah-u-Akbar” only understands Arabic. I advise you to return to your lizard infested deserts. Do not let loose upon our cities your cruel barbarous Arabs who are like rabid animals. Refrain from the murder of my people. Refrain from pillaging my people. Refrain from kidnapping our daughters in the name of your “Allah-u-Akbar”. Refrain from these crimes and  evils.We Iranians are a forgiving people, a kind and well-meaning people. Wherever we go, we sow the seeds of goodness, amity and righteousness. And this is why we have the capacity to overlook the crimes and the misdeeds of your Arabs. Stay in your desert with your “Allah-u-Akbar”, and do not approach our cities; for horrid is your belief and brutish is your conduct.” (Shah Yazdgird III, Emperor of Persia 
Within 15 years Persia was utterly defeated and Shah Yazdgird was forced into exile. He was killed by a common thief in 651AD
SOME THINGS HAVE NOT CHANGED

Wednesday, September 7, 2016

Former Counter Terror US Agent SUMMARY

T SPEAKER. PHILIP HANEY. WHEN THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY WAS FOUNDED IN 2003, IT STATED PURPOSE WAS PREVENTING TERROR TERRORIST ATTACKS WITHIN THE UNITED STATES AND REDUCING AMERICA'S VULNERABILITY TO TERRORISM. BY THE TIME PRESIDENT OBAMA TOOK OFFICE, MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD LINKED LEADERS IN THE UNITED STATES WERE FORCING CHANGES TO NATIONAL SECURITY POLICY AND BEING INVITED INTO THE HIGHEST CHAMBERS OF INFLUENCE. A POLICY KNOWN AS COUNTERING VIOLENT EXTREMISM EMERGED DOWN PLAYING THE THREAT OF ISLAM AND UNRELATED TO THE RELIGION AND ONE AMONG THE I HAD I DON'T LOGICAL MOVEMENTS. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY CHARTER MEMBER AND RETIRED EXPERT PHILIP HANEY BRAVELY BROUGHT UP THE PEOPLE AND ORGANIZATIONS THAT THREATEN THIS ORGANIZATION TO HIS CHAIN OF COMMAND. HIS INTELLIGENCE INFORMATION WAS ELIMINATED AND HE WAS INVESTIGATED BY THE VERY AGENCY ASSIGNED TO PROTECT THIS COUNTRY. THE NATIONAL CAMPAIGN BY THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY TO RAISE PUBLIC AWARENESS OF TERRORISM AND TERRORISM-RELATED CRIME KNOWN AS, IF YOU SEE SOMETHING SAY SOMETHING, EFFECTIVELY HAS BECOME, IF YOU SEE SOMETHING, SAY NOTHING. WHICH IS THE TITLE OF HIS NEW BOOK, "SEE SOMETHING, SAY NOTHING,"

Muslim Brotherhood Infiltration of US Government by founder of Dept of Homeland security

Most scary video on how under the guise of religious freedom and diversity Brotherhood is influencing US government at the highest level. please circulate.

Philip Haney is founder of Department of Homeland Security and Counter terror specialist fluent in Arabic and lived in the Mid East, hounded by US government for doing his job!!! and mentioning 

terms such as
Islam, Islamic Terror, Sharia and reporting on Hamas.

 If he was allowed to do his job both Orlando and San Bernardino attacks could have been stopped.

Tuesday, August 16, 2016

Ganita vs mathematics: Ten myths of Western math

C. K. Raju

Centre for Studies in Civilizations, New Delhi

Extended abstract

We reject the myth that Western math is universal. That was always anormative universality: while it was admitted that other ways of doing math existed, it was claimed that Western math was “superior”. This claim of “superiority” (e.g. the claim that metaphysical proofs are “superior” to empirical proofs) rests merely on some anti-scientific church dogmas born of hate politics. Further, the purported “superiority” of Western math, exactly like racist claims of “superiority”, is supported by the very same fabricated church/racist/colonial history (e.g. the myth of Euclid and the myth of his deductive proofs).
Any serious study of plurality in math must critically re-examine other ways of doing math, and select the better way of doing math. Whichmath should be taught in schools and universities? We cannot just assume that existing (colonial) math education should persist. Nor even can we continue to justify it merely on unexamined Western myths and dogmas, even if they are widely believed today (justbecause colonial education propagates them). Indeed, since math is taught as a compulsory subject in schools today, if the present way of teaching it rests on (and subtly propagates) religious dogmas, and related myths, as it does, its teaching must be changed in schools in any secular country.
To this end, of deciding which math is better, we compare formal math with religiously-neutral Indian ganita (together with the explicit philosophy of zeroism). We have selected ganita not for reasons of its Indian origins, but because it concerns practical value, which is surely more universal than Western dogmatic metaphysics. Further, most math taught in schools today (arithmetic, algebra, trigonometry, calculus, probability) historically originated as ganita. Also, those same ganita techniques of calculation continue to be used today for almost all practical applications of math to commerce, science and engineering (and indeed in all computer-based numerical calculations, such as those used to send a spacecraft to Mars, or to make stock-market predictions).
While the West imported ganita for its practical value, its epistemology clashed with the religiously-loaded epistemology of math in the West (e.g. all computer-based numerical calculations are today declared “erroneous”). Ganita was made theologically correct by (a) giving it a veneer of metaphysics (e.g. the use of metaphysical limits in calculus, to align its notion of infinity with church dogmas about eternity), and (b) packaging it with a false history (e.g. that Newton and Leibniz invented the calculus). This cocktail of practical value, religious metaphysics, and false history, was just declared “superior” and globalised by colonial education. Selecting ganita over formal math preserves the practical value, while eliminating the false history and bad metaphysics. Indeed practical value is enhanced: e.g., eliminating Newton’s conceptual confusion about calculus leads to a better theory of gravity. Or, e.g., teaching calculus as ganita enables students do harder problems.
However, the bad metaphysics and false history, underlying formal math, is a key part of colonial indoctrination (“education”). The indoctrinated cling to myths: when one myth is challenged, they try to “save” it by appealing to another (e.g. if the myth of Euclid is challenged they invoke the myth of deductive proofs in the Elements). Hence, to decolonise, the whole collectivity of myths must be simultaneously denied. If this denial is to be intelligible, it cannot also be brief: for brevity assumes shared beliefs. Thus a demand for brevity, in this context, becomes a trick to block dissent.


India and Terror vs Poverty

PM of India Modi 15th August 2016  Independence day address to the nation highlighted the fight against terror and Maoism and said "On the other hand, terrorism is being glorified. When innocent people are killed in terrorist attacks, there are celebrations. What kind of life is this which is inspired by terrorism? How governments are formed through inspiration of terrorism" He also acknowledged messages of support for from the peoples of Balochistan, Gilgit, (Pakistani Provinces) and Pakistan Occupied Kashmir who have thanked him, they have little democratic rights suffer both terror and poverty. He stated the main fight of the SAARC nations is of poverty, not a fight with each other. Reducing corruption, good governance and transparency are ways to help economic progress to lift millions out of poverty. He named a village only 3 hours from Delhi but it took 70 years for electricity to reach there. With a population of 800 million under the age of 35, India is set to use this human capital to become the work horse and economic powerhouse of the world, in the coming years.

FULL SPEECH HERE   http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-news-india/pm-narendra-modis-speech-on-independence-day-2016-here-is-the-full-text/